Home
Help for parents
Legislative Update
News
Understanding the issue
Personal stories
Media coverage
Criticism from experts
Juvenile sex law
Get involved
Discussion board
Reading list
Organizations and links
Research on youth sexuality
References:
1. Burton, D. & Smith-Darden, J.,
North American Survey of Sexual Abuser Treatment and Models
2000, Brandon, VT: Safer Society Foundation, 2001.
2. Jenkins, P., Moral Panic, Yale University Press,
1998.
3. Okami, P., “'Child Perpetrators of
Sexual Abuse': The Emergence of a Problematic Deviant Category,” Journal
of
Sex Research, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 209-130, 1992.
4. "Understanding
Juvenile
Sexual Offending Behavior," Center for Sex Offender
Management, December 1999.
5. Weis, D., Childhood Sexuality, in
Robert
T. Francoeur (ed.), The International Encyclopedia of
Sexuality, New York: Continuum, 1997.
6.
Yankowski, L., Testimony
to the Arizona Senate's Committee on Children's Psychological Treatment
Programs, September 16, 1992.

|
DEJA VU
"Fear is the main source of superstition, and one of
the main sources of cruelty."
--Bertrand Russell
“The homosexual will
murder his victim during an act of sexual frenzy and afterwards rob
him.” These are the words of an expert--a psychiatrist working for the
police 50 years ago.2 According to historian Philip Jenkins, these were years of moral panic over
“sex psychopaths” which especially focused on homosexuals. Public fears
and perceptions that homosexuals were violent led to the imprisonment
of homosexuals and their treatment with aversion therapy and other
forms of arousal reconditioning.
The factors
that allowed the unethical treatment of homosexuals included:
-
lack of knowledge
-
confusion of socially
inappropriate behavior with illness and violence
-
inflated public and
professional fears
-
belief that the danger
justified experimental, unethical measures
-
lack of
oversight and accountability
These same
factors encouraged similar treatment of the mentally ill, and now
contribute to the current treatment of children labeled as sex
offenders.
-
Lack of knowledge:
Within
American culture, childhood sexuality remains an area that has been
largely unexplored by researchers.5
--Researcher David Weis
-
Confusing indecency with
violence:
The literature
on child perpetrators contains a "consistent tendency among the writers
under discussion here to conflate what they term 'abnormal', 'unusual',
or 'inappropriate' sexual behaviors with 'abusive', 'molestation',
'victimizing', or 'perpetration' behaviors."3
--Researcher Paul Okami
-
Moral panic: Articles
about treatment for juvenile sex offenders and children with sexual
behavior problems typically begin with striking statistics about the
number of teenagers and children (as young as 3) who are sexually
abusive, but fail to reveal that these statistics include non-coercive
behavior.4
-
Dangers justifying inhumane measures:
Several of the
witnesses before this committee have presented startling figures
regarding the high incidence of child sexual abuse and the need for
effective interventions" to justify "unproven, unsupervised
experimentation on children...the witnesses before this committee
defended this practice with the implication that these weren't normal
children anyway.6
--Attorney Lois
Yankowski
-
Lack of accountability:
The legislature
should also mandate a regular process for review and monitoring of any
programs. The testimony presented thus far has demonstrated that these
functions were not performed with respect to substance of the Phoenix
Memorial program...The secrecy which surrounds juvenile court
proceedings means that the public has never had the opportunity to
scrutinize the actual practice in these facilities.6
--Attorney Lois
Yankowski
Unfortunately, conditions have not changed much since then. According
to the Safer Society Foundation's 2000 survey, only 13% of juvenile
offender programs and 20% of programs for younger children are state
certified. This is primarily because most states do not have procedures
to oversee or certify them.1
Now
find out what you
can do.
|
When
experts are wrong
Casualties of war
Diagnosis
Lack of
knowledge
Confused
definitions
Criminalization
Invalid
instruments
Treatment
Humiliation
as
therapy
Arousal
reconditioning
Dangerous
drugs
Sriking
comparisons
Sample
materials
Convos
with
providers
Ethical
violations
Deja vu |